Logo

Programming-Idioms

  • Pascal
  • C++
  • Java

Idiom #223 for else loop

Loop through list items checking a condition. Do something else if no matches are found.

A typical use case is looping through a series of containers looking for one that matches a condition. If found, an item is inserted; otherwise, a new container is created.

These are mostly used as an inner nested loop, and in a location where refactoring inner logic into a separate function reduces clarity.

import static java.lang.System.out;
 a: {
     b: {
            int i, n = items.size();
            for (i = 0; i < n; ++i)
                if (f(items.get(i)))
                    break b;
            out.println("not found");
            break a;
        }
        out.println("found");
    }
boolean b = false;
for (int i = 0; i<items.length; i++) {
	if (items[i] == something) {
		doSomething();
		b = true;
	}
}
if (!b)
	doSomethingElse();

Java does not have a for else loop natively. Therefore we must use a boolean value to do something if no matches are found.
Predicate<Item> condition;
items.stream()
	.filter(condition)
	.findFirst()
	.ifPresentOrElse(
		item -> doSomething(i),
		() -> doSomethingElse());

This requires at least Java 8, and uses a stream instead of a loop to get to the same result.
Found := False;
for Item in Items do
begin
  if Item.MatchesCondition then
  begin
    Found := True;
    Break;
  end;
end;
if not Found then 
  DoSomethingElse;
#include <algorithm>
if (std::any_of(items.begin(), items.end(), condition))
    baz();
else
    DoSomethingElse();

Calls condition(x) on each element in items until one returns true
#include <list>
bool found = false;
for (const auto item : items) {
  if (item == "baz") {
    baz();
    found = true;
    break;
  }
}
if (!found) {
  DoSomethingElse();
}

c++ 11 implementation

c++ doesn't have for..else construction, so found variable can be used instead
(if (seq (filter odd? my-col))
  "contains odds"
  "no odds found")

(seq (filter pred-fn col)) returns nil when there are no matches, and nil is falsy.

New implementation...